Engine Active
|INDEX: 847M DOCUMENTS · UPDATED: 2026-02-25 20:24 UTC

Legal Research Intelligence

Every precedent.
Before the brief.

Query
§ 01 — The Problem

The law doesn't
wait for you
to catch up.

Every day, thousands of new cases are filed, decided, and cited. The practitioner who finds the right precedent first wins. The one still searching Westlaw at 2 a.m. doesn't.

New Case Filings Today
Live · Federal + State Courts
2,847
+1 in last 2 minutes2026-02-25
12.4hrs
Average research hours per motion
Across Am Law 200 firms, 2025
68%
Of associates' billable time is research
NALP Survey, 2024
$847/hr
Average partner billing rate
Burning on Westlaw searches
2:17am
Median time of last Westlaw session
Before a motion deadline
"It was 2:17 a.m. I had seven Westlaw tabs open, a motion due at 9, and I still hadn't found the controlling case. I knew it existed. I just couldn't find it in time."
MR
Michael Reyes
Litigation Partner · Reyes & Nakamura LLP · Chicago
◈ Then the machine arrived ◈
§ 02 — Precedent Intelligence + Motion Engine

Ranked by
jurisdictional weight.
Not keyword count.

Counsel understands the hierarchy of authority. SCOTUS binds circuits. Circuits bind districts. State supreme courts control state law claims. The engine weights accordingly — so you cite what controls, not what merely mentions.

Practice Area:
Showing results for: Employment · 9th Circuit + California
#
Case
Court
Auth. Weight
Relevance
01
Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. v. White
548 U.S. 53 (2006)
SCOTUS
100/100
97%
02
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton
524 U.S. 775 (1998)
SCOTUS
100/100
94%
03
Novosel v. Nationwide Ins. Co.
721 F.2d 894 (3d Cir. 1983)
3D CIR.
85/100
91%
04
Grinzi v. San Diego Hospice Corp.
120 Cal.App.4th 72 (2004)
CAL. APP.
75/100
88%
05
Barbee v. Household Automotive
113 Cal.App.4th 525 (2003)
CAL. APP.
75/100
84%
06
Gay Law Students v. Pacific Tel.
24 Cal.3d 458 (1979)
CAL. SUP.
80/100
79%

Motion Template Engine

Pre-populated with controlling precedents · Edit in workspace

Beta · Free in Trial
Motion for Summary Judgment
READY
12
Clauses
8
Precedents
Opposition to MSJ
READY
9
Clauses
11
Precedents
Motion to Compel Discovery
READY
6
Clauses
4
Precedents
Preliminary Injunction Brief
DRAFT
14
Clauses
16
Precedents
§ 03 — Citation Network Visualization

Find the argument
no one else found.

Every case is a node. Every citation is an edge. Counsel maps the entire citation network to surface cases that are three hops away but directly on point — the ones your opponent didn't find.

Hover any node to illuminate its citation chain. The thicker the edge, the stronger the precedential relationship.

Hover a node to inspect its citation chain
Burlington NorthernSCOTUSFaragher v.SCOTUSEllerth v.SCOTUSNovosel v.3D CIR.Grinzi v.CAL. APP.Barbee v.CAL. APP.Harris v.SCOTUSOncale v.SCOTUSGay LawCAL. SUP.Reno v.CAL. SUP.
SCOTUS / Anchor
Circuit / State Sup.
Appellate

Your case network is waiting to be mapped.

No form. No credit card. Pre-loaded with a real federal circuit query.

Run Your First Query →
Engine active · 847M documents indexed
Run Your First Query →